Follow us on Facebook to receive important updates Follow us on Twitter to receive important updates Follow us on sina.com's microblogging site to receive important updates Follow us on Douban to receive important updates
Chinese Text Project Wiki
-> -> Search for "ctext:178376"
This textual edition has had punctuation added automatically using artifical intelligence. The results of this process are inevitably imperfect; please help correct mistakes by editing the text.
Search details:
Scope: 明文海
Condition : References 「演繁露
Total 1

卷一百七十二

13
《答童宮諭廟災儀注第二書熊過昨奉書已旋於壇所省讀華牘,宏博淵深,開導備至,得所未聞,加於提耳之教矣過,何幸何幸?當時士人共仰折衷,轉相傳誦,幾失原本,數日方得,遂未裁答,今尚有疑者,願終惠教,它時有聞不敢忘所,師資来教辭,引燕泉陽明所酧對,欲以定世之疑不肖,非敢別出臆度也,顧以古人尊祖之義,視敬天常少詘,故祀天地則越紼而行事,不敢以卑者之事而忘尊者之禮也,其敢以卑者之祭,而忘尊者之變乎?即使失世職,如左氏所言,則當是之時,謫見乎天,祖宗神靈固己震疊為子孫者,正當體祖宗之意,以災為告而廢之,所謂先王克謹天戒,臣人克有常憲者也,而以接祭為言,是忘天而昵祖,聖人致辨於天神人鬼之際者,果如此否乎?西宫之言,公羊杜氏之說,此亦常求三傳之異同而粗習其讀,但今之稱宫者多指廟為言,惟傳乃有小異。爾雅曰:宫謂之室,室謂之宫,則西宮者為之小寢,別宫如公羊,杜氏亦可也,例之火、踰公宫之說亦可也。其如春秋之所稱宮者,皆以廟言,何哉?春秋經,凡居室皆不稱宮,故王姬之舘人居也,稱舘不稱宮,謂凡室皆可稱宮,經無是法也,西宫書於經者也,以經之例觀之,是不可証其為廟乎?此不獨春秋耳。詩定之方中作于楚宮,鄭箋曰:居,室也。又如采蘋公侯之宮。毛氏曰,宮廟也,豳上入執宮功,所謂營居室,宗廟為先,故稱宮功也。至魯頌閟宫之地,亦是魯人安靈之所是,宫之必為廟而室之,不得以淆其辭,古人正名百物,未嘗假借,後世乃通之耳。桓僖公宮災,來教云親盡而不毀者,杜征南之說也。季氏出於桓立,於僖以是為悅而不毀,故孔子言之,康侯之說也。然成公六年嘗立武宮,定公元年嘗立煬宮矣,是三公者,皆春秋以前之君也,其親盡當毀視之,桓尤甚,孔子言當毀,何不及武煬,而何言僖乎?桓僖之不毁?誠以季氏當時,武煬之立又誰主之乎?則征南康侯之二說,愚皆有不逹矣,來教又謂即哭矣,亦例不得書,今將以何為例,而知其不當書乎?春秋之法,其有事如哭廟而不書者乎?假使實有其事,經以例不書矣,而傳亦遂冺其迹者乎?是大可疑也。新宮之哭,胡子獨棄諸家之說,而又為辭曰於遷主,其言無㩀,杜鄭之徒以為當哭。夫杜鄭注疏也,皆定於頴,逹諸儒之手過特有所從違,非敢棄經而信傳也。其謂哭廟而當禮者,以其情則知矣,而終若無㩀世之言哭廟者,往往以梁山為例,蓋梁山之崩,左氏、國語兩皆載之,左氏止以降服、乗縵、徹樂、出次、祝幣史辭為言,獨國語有國三日哭」之語,先正常謂國語者,左氏刪定之,棄餘信斯言也,將從左氏而不哭乎?將從國語而哭乎?將從其所刪定者乎?亦將不計其所棄餘而從之乎?今以西宮桓僖之不哭而定之,所謂情則同而終若無㩀者,不將近之乎?禮曰:人有焚其先人之室,則三日哭信。如公羊、杜氏遂以西宮為小寢,則固不得為廟矣,亦豈不為先人之室乎?為先人之室矣,而經不書哭,傳無有文者,亦豈例不得書乎?將實無其禮乎?至於易服之儀不肖,當時㩀舊聞為言,及後思之,猶有所未盡,縁周官司服有大烖、素服之文,康成乃云素服縞冠,素服也,來教云易服深得,禮意不肖初所不及也,但云欲略如居䘮之儀,當烏帽角帶、縞衣遍。考古喪服無縞衣者,蓋䘮則必衰,故斬齊衰之外,錫衰細衰皆衰也。無縞衣以處䘮者,禮除成䘮用朝服,朝服者緇衣素裳,非素衣也。詩素冠之二章曰:庶見素衣。康成㩀禮之䘮服之,無素衣也,遂轉衣為裳以求合之,呂伯恭譏其牽合矣。然則縞衣似非居䘮之服也。司服有云,其齊服有𤣥端素端,變服言端者,自袂言之,大夫以上侈袂故也。然則素者乃是齋居,將有所禱諸上下之通服也,不得言為䘮服。吳白紵歌曰:質如輕雲色,如銀制,以為袍,餘作巾。此雖不足以明禮,然亦可見素是古人常服。今周宻《癸辛雜志》、程大昌演繁露》及劉績《霏雪録皆同斯志,其言恐是不謬。乃知杜夷等不服者,謂不䘮服非不素服,其義自精確耳。過欲如来教,自大夫以上定為縞冠,素侈袂服,自五品以下,其袂止可比之元士等,定為縞冠素端,祭畢則已,不知可不可也。或侈袂不便,則上下通服,素團領耳,執事髙賢,宇內宗仰,又有發䝉之意,不肖所陳,必不以為凟而不告也。恃愛多言,恐懼恐懼,過頓首頓首。

Enjoy this site? Please help.Site design and content copyright 2006-2024. When quoting or citing information from this site, please link to the corresponding page or to https://ctext.org. Please note that the use of automatic download software on this site is strictly prohibited, and that users of such software are automatically banned without warning to save bandwidth. 沪ICP备09015720号-3Comments? Suggestions? Please raise them here.